What is Evolutionary Feminism?

"It's about the children, stupid!"
William A. Spriggs
September 2009

 

 


“That suggests that females mated preferentially with smaller-fanged males.  In order for females to have had so much power…Ar. Ramidus must have developed a social system in which males were cooperative.” Time magazine, October 12, 2009, p. 45.

Quoting C. Owen Lovejoy, Kent State University anthropologist, a member of the Middle Awash (Ethiopia) team on the discovery of 4.4 million year old female, Ardipithecus ramidus whose canine teeth are relatively stubby compared with the sharp, dagger-like upper fangs that male chimps and gorillas use to do battle.  And to quote Time magazine again, same page:  “ The male canine tooth is no longer projecting or sharp, It’s no longer weaponry.”

Dr. Owen's use of “mated preferentially” is another way of saying, “mated by choice,” or “sexually selected” as in “sexual selection” (Darwin’s “other” theory).

 


Updated References for Feminists from news media outlets (ok--mostly from The New York Times)

Please note:

The notes below the Horizontial Rule are still being procesed.. W.A.S. October, 11 2009

 

Yes, some core beliefs are emerging..  These beliefs have not been debated in peer review publications but merely what is emerging through the cultural dialogue taking place on the internet, personal correspondence, or salon conversations. W.A.S., September, 2009

 

>Radical evolutionary feminists take the position that the female of our species is the superior sex.  Moderate EFers tend to think that the sexes are equal in their mating strategies with good natured debate between the two.

 >Sexual Selection is the academic wording for “Attraction” has morphed into “Romantic Attraction” to the most modern version: "Romantic Love.”  The last phrases are products of the work of Dr. Helen Fisher, anthropological evolutionist. (See my Essay:….footnotes, 3, 4, & 5. for references).


Some good related points to remember:

>Sex vs. Gender
Sex is the biological term for male or female -
Gender is the socially constructed distinction -
However, most EFers are firm believers in the 40/60 percentage combination of nature/nurture, with nurture, or the socially constructed view of male/female separation winning the culture wars, thus the term, gender is more acceptable and more "polite" when writing to the general audience.

Like the famous political statement attributed to Jim Carville to then, candidate, Bill Clinton about the core belief of the people's reason to vote: It's the economy stupid." So, too, in evolutionary thought that "It's about the resources, people." Which morphs to the evolutionary feminist's credo: "It's about the children, stupid!"

Radical evolutionary feminists take the position that the female of our species is the superior sex. Moderate EFers tend to think that the sexes are equal in their mating strategies with good natured debate between the two.

Therefore: if sexual selection is the primary driving evolutionary force in human reproduction, then the female’s decision about her body and reproductive choice, is inviolable. Bumper sticker view: pro-choice is inviolable.
WAS - September 8th, 2009

In no particular order, I will place the links to the left...

Updated References for Feminists from news media outlets (ok--mostly from The New York Times)

FEMINIST READINGS WITH EMPHASIS On Biology>Evolution>& Culture

 

******************************************************************************

On September 07, 2009 at 5:25am MST, while working on new, more simpler explanation to the question above, the power in my home was shut off and restored within seconds. My son-in-law and I both agree that Comcast.net was working on a power transfers related to moving utilities for the future construction of the light rail that will pass near our home in 2013. Even though power was returned, connection to the internet was lost for over four hours.

After attempting to resume my rewrite, I discovered that the main entryway to this section -- What is Evolutionary Feminism? -- was lost. That was just the front doorway; 80% of the information is still saved, but it has to be all put back on the front entryway page. Perhaps, some 12 hours of future work has to be re-done.

They tell me that things like this happen for a reason, and if that is the case then I believe that God or whatever power is out there wants an updated piece of work.

And so, it shall be. I will make an attempt to have most of it completed by October 12, 2009

William A. Spriggs
September 7th, 2009